Generate a Privacy Policy Checklist for GDPR and CCPA
A useful privacy policy must connect what an organization collects with why it is used, where it goes, how long it remains, and which rights people can exercise.
Run — free
This generator turns your personal data categories and target jurisdictions into a structured drafting checklist. It covers broadly expected transparency topics, adds focused prompts for information such as health, location, payment, children’s, workforce, and online identifier data, and includes tailored GDPR or CCPA/CPRA items when selected. The result is a planning aid for legal review, not a finished policy or legal advice.
Start with an accurate data inventory
A privacy notice cannot be reliable when its inputs are vague. Begin with the categories the organization actually collects, not a copied list from another company. Include information supplied by customers, generated by devices, inferred through analytics, received from partners, and retained in support or transaction records. Use recognizable descriptions such as contact information, payment information, precise location, health data, online identifiers, or applicant records. The generator preserves your wording and adds focused checklist items when a category indicates heightened concerns. For example, location information calls for an explanation of precision, frequency, purposes, and user controls, while payment information calls for clarity about payment providers and fraud prevention. Review the resulting category list against product flows, vendor contracts, databases, mobile permissions, forms, cookies, and internal processes. A checklist can expose questions, but it cannot discover an undocumented data flow. Assign an owner to resolve every mismatch before drafting. This inventory-first approach makes the later clauses specific enough to inform readers and reduces the risk that a polished policy describes only part of the real processing operation.
Match clauses to the targeted legal regimes
Jurisdiction selection changes the checklist because privacy regimes organize transparency duties differently. Selecting GDPR or an EU reference adds prompts for lawful bases, data subject rights, qualifying automated decisions, supervisory authority complaints, and safeguards for restricted international transfers. Selecting UK GDPR produces the same core family of prompts while keeping the target visible. Selecting CCPA, CPRA, or California adds the category-based look-back disclosures, sale and sharing explanations, preference-signal and opt-out treatment, California consumer rights, sensitive personal information limitations, verification, and authorized-agent procedures. These additions are drafting prompts, not conclusions that every listed clause applies. Applicability can depend on business thresholds, the person’s relationship with the organization, exemptions, the processing purpose, and later legal changes. Unknown jurisdiction names do not cause the algorithm to invent rules. They remain part of the user’s planning context, but qualified counsel should supply the correct local requirements. Treat the generated list as a coverage map: identify the owner, evidence, and proposed language for each item, mark genuinely inapplicable items with a documented reason, and obtain current legal review for every market in which the notice will be used.
Turn the checklist into a policy people can use
A complete checklist is only the beginning. Draft each clause in plain language and connect categories, sources, purposes, recipients, retention, and rights instead of scattering generic statements across the document. Replace phrases such as “we may use information for business purposes” with concrete explanations tied to real operations. Where a clause is conditional, confirm the underlying facts before including or removing it. Make request instructions operational: publish working contact methods, explain identity verification, cover authorized agents where relevant, and ensure the team receiving requests can meet the promises in the policy. Coordinate cookie controls, advertising opt-outs, mobile permissions, and preference signals with the text so user choices work in practice. Check that international-transfer language matches contracts and vendor locations, and that retention descriptions match an approved schedule. Finally, give the policy an effective date and a process for notifying people of material changes. Re-run the generator when a product starts collecting a new category, enters a new jurisdiction, changes vendors, or introduces profiling. The API costs $0.002 per request, making it practical to include this check in a documented release or governance workflow.
What you can do with it
Prepare a first policy draft
Give a product or legal team a structured coverage map based on the information the service actually collects.
Review a policy before launch
Compare an existing draft with category-specific and jurisdiction-specific prompts before entering a new market.
Assess a product change
Generate an updated checklist when a feature adds location, payment, health, tracking, or other personal data.
FAQ
Does this generate a complete privacy policy?
No. It produces a drafting and review checklist. The final policy must reflect actual practices and receive qualified legal review.
Which jurisdictions receive tailored clauses?
The deterministic rules recognize GDPR and EU references, UK GDPR and UK references, and CCPA, CPRA, or California references. Other entries do not produce invented legal rules.
What happens if I provide no data categories?
The request fails with an invalid input error because a meaningful checklist requires at least one personal data category.
Can I enter my own category names?
Yes. Use descriptions that match your inventory. The generator preserves them and recognizes common signals for sensitive, children’s, financial, location, online, contact, and workforce data.
Is this legal advice?
No. It is general drafting information. Applicability and exact requirements depend on current law, business facts, processing context, and exemptions.
For developers — API access
Everything on this page is available programmatically. This section is for teams who want to wire it into their own systems; everyone else can just use the tool above.
API endpoint
Prefer to automate it? One authenticated POST creates the task; the result comes back by webhook or a signed link. The same capability also runs here on the web, by email and from Telegram — and soon from our app too.
Call it from your stack
curl -X POST https://api.kit.forhosting.com/doc/privacy-policy-checklist \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $KIT_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"data_categories":["contact information","payment information","online identifiers"]}'const res = await fetch("https://api.kit.forhosting.com/doc/privacy-policy-checklist", {
method: "POST",
headers: {
"Authorization": `Bearer ${process.env.KIT_KEY}`,
"Content-Type": "application/json"
},
body: JSON.stringify({
"data_categories": [
"contact information",
"payment information",
"online identifiers"
]
})
});
const { task_id } = await res.json();import os, requests
res = requests.post(
"https://api.kit.forhosting.com/doc/privacy-policy-checklist",
headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {os.environ['KIT_KEY']}"},
json={
"data_categories": [
"contact information",
"payment information",
"online identifiers"
]
},
)
task_id = res.json()["task_id"]<?php
$res = file_get_contents("https://api.kit.forhosting.com/doc/privacy-policy-checklist", false, stream_context_create([
"http" => [
"method" => "POST",
"header" => "Authorization: Bearer " . getenv("KIT_KEY") . "\r\nContent-Type: application/json",
"content" => '{"data_categories":["contact information","payment information","online identifiers"]}',
],
]));
$task = json_decode($res, true);body := bytes.NewBufferString(`{"data_categories":["contact information","payment information","online identifiers"]}`)
req, _ := http.NewRequest("POST", "https://api.kit.forhosting.com/doc/privacy-policy-checklist", body)
req.Header.Set("Authorization", "Bearer "+os.Getenv("KIT_KEY"))
req.Header.Set("Content-Type", "application/json")
res, _ := http.DefaultClient.Do(req)Example request
{
"data_categories": [
"contact information",
"payment information",
"online identifiers"
]
}Example response
{
"task_id": "tsk_a1b2c3d4e5f6a1b2c3d4e5f6",
"type": "doc.privacy_policy_checklist",
"status": "queued",
"_links": {
"result": "/tasks/tsk_…/result"
}
}The API is asynchronous: the call returns a task_id immediately and the result arrives by webhook. Polling is capped at 1 req/s per task.
Pricing
Published price — no tokens, no invented credits. A failed task is never charged.
Limits
max_mb | 25 |
max_pages | 200 |
Errors
| HTTP | Code | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
401 | unauthorized | Missing or invalid API key. |
402 | insufficient_balance | Your balance doesn't cover the task price. |
404 | unknown_type | That task type doesn't exist. |
429 | rate_limited | Too many requests. Use the webhook instead of polling. |